Serial
pattern complexity: Irregularity and hierarchy
Peter A. van der
Helm, Rob J. van Lier, Emanuel L. J. Leeuwenberg
Abstract. In
perception research, various models have been designed for the encoding
of e.g. visual patterns, in order to predict the human interpretation
of such patterns. Each of these encoding models provides a few coding
rules to obtain codes of a pattern, each code expressing regularity and
hierarchy in that pattern. Some of these models employ the minimum
principle which states that the human interpretation of a pattern is
reflected by the simplest code of that pattern. That is, the simplest
code according to a given complexity metric. We propose a new
complexity metric. This metric is based on a formal analysis of the
concept of regularity. Some conclusions of this analysis are sketched.
The formal analysis itself is presented elsewhere (van der Helm
& Leeuwenberg, 1991). The new metric does not depend on
artifacts of the coding rules (cf. Hatfield & Epstein, 1985).
It accounts for the amounts of irregularity and hierarchy as
represented in a code of a pattern, such that these two amounts can be
added to determine the complexity of a code. We will discuss an
experiment that shows that the new metric performs significantly better
than metrics used before. In particular, the new metric predicts more
local pattern organizations than the old metrics. This implies that
various local pattern organizations do not falsify the minimum
principle anymore.