Accessibility,
a criterion for regularity and hierarchy in visual
pattern codes
Peter A. van der
Helm, Emanuel L. J. Leeuwenberg
Abstract. In
research on visual shape perception, various models have been designed
for the encoding of visual patterns, in order to predict the human
interpretation
of such patterns. Each of these encoding models provides a few coding
rules
to obtain codes of a pattern, each code describing regularity and
hierarchy
in that pattern. Some of these models employ the minimum principle
which states that the human interpretation of a pattern is reflected by
the simplest
code of that pattern. Despite empirical support, these encoding models
suffer
from three fundamental problems. First, although many coding rules can
be
proposed, no encoding model provides a psychological basis for those
few
coding rules that have been chosen (cf. Simon, 1972). Second, the
minimum
principle seems to require an unrealistic search for simplest pattern
codes
since, for any pattern, the number of possible codes is combinatorially
explosive (cf. Hatfield & Epstein, 1985). Third, the
quantification
of simplicity is controversial and is suspected to depend too much on
artifacts
of the employed encoding model (cf. Hatfield & Epstein, 1985).
The present
study provides a coherent solution to these problems, based on the
concept
of accessibility. The concept of accessibility simply implies that
regularity
and hierarchy in the code of a pattern correspond directly to
regularity
and hierarchy in the pattern itself. This correspondence is specified
by
the notions of holographic regularity and transparent hierarchy. These
two
notions are based on a strictly formal analysis of regularity and
hierarchy,
and lead to just a few coding rules which, essentially, describe only
three
classes of regularities: Iterations, symmetries, and so-called
alternations. Furthermore, the concept of accessibility enables an
efficient and largely
parallel encoding process, in which the simplest code of a pattern can
be
obtained without generating the explosive number of all possible codes
(see
also van der Helm & Leeuwenberg, 1986; van der Helm, 1988).
Finally,
the concept of accessibility gives rise to an improved and promising
quantification
of simplicity.
|
Journal
of Mathematical Psychology, 35, 151--213 (1991) |
Full
text |
|